Forensic Evaluations in Mental Health: Expert Assessments Synergy Mental Health and Wellness Integrated

Forensic Evaluations in Mental Health: Expert Assessments Synergy Mental Health and Wellness Integrated

Image Hero

Comprehensive Forensic Psychiatry Services in Arizona

Synergy Mental Health and Wellness Integrated (SMHWI) offers a wide range of specialized forensic psychiatry services in Arizona, conducted by our experienced team of forensic psychiatrists. We understand the vital role expert psychiatric evaluations play in various legal and medical contexts. Our dedicated forensic psychiatrists provide comprehensive assessments, thorough evaluations, and detailed reports tailored to the unique needs of our clients.

Independent Psychiatric Evaluations (IPE)

Our Independent Psychiatric Evaluations are a cornerstone of our forensic psychiatry services. These evaluations involve a meticulous examination of records, psychological testing, and in-depth interviews. We undertake IPEs for various essential reasons, including:

Assessing Mental Health Injuries: We determine the cause and extent of mental health injuries, offering critical insights into their origins and implications.

Treatment Options and Appropriateness: Our evaluations delve into the suitability of treatment options, exploring whether alternative treatments could be more effective.

Maximizing Treatment Benefits: We assess whether individuals have achieved the maximum benefit from their current treatment plans and explore additional strategies if needed.

Determining Impairment and Disability Duration: Our forensic psychiatrists evaluate the duration of temporary or short-term impairment/disability and provide expert opinions on whether a mental health impairment is permanent.

Clinical Status and Fitness for Duty: We offer assessments of current clinical status, severity of conditions, and the individual’s fitness for duty in various contexts.

image services

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)

As an integral part of our Independent Medical/Psychiatric Evaluations, we often include the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). This widely recognized standardized psychometric test consists of hundreds of True-False questions. Completion of the MMPI takes approximately one to two hours and serves as a valuable tool for validating mental health issues. However, it’s crucial to note that our diagnoses are not solely based on the results of this test.

Our commitment to delivering thorough, unbiased, and expert forensic psychiatric evaluations ensures that our clients receive the highest level of professionalism and accuracy in their assessments. At SMHWI, we recognize the significance of these evaluations in legal and medical contexts, and our experienced forensic psychiatrists are dedicated to providing the insights needed for informed decisions.

Contact Us


At Synergy Mental Health and Wellness Integrated (SMHWI), we offer comprehensive Medical Peer Review (MPR) services that go beyond standard evaluations. Our MPR process is designed to provide in-depth scrutiny of medical documents, ensuring a meticulous analysis of complex cases involving mental health. We understand the critical role that MPR plays in assessing mental illness, determining impairment, establishing connections to potential injuries, and evaluating the appropriateness of medical treatments.

image services
image services bg cards

Key Aspects of Our MPR Services

image services cards

Comprehensive Document Review

Our MPR process begins with a thorough examination of all relevant medical documents, ensuring that no crucial details are overlooked. We leave no stone unturned when assessing the intricacies of each case.

image services cards

In-Depth Analysis of Mental Health

Our expert team of psychiatrists and mental health therapist specializes in mental assessments. We meticulously evaluate the presence of mental illness and provide insights into its nature and impact.

image services cards

Impairment Assessment

We determine the extent of impairment caused by mental health conditions, offering valuable perspectives on how these conditions affect an individual’s daily life and functionality.

image services cards

Relationship to Injury

In cases where mental health disorder may be linked to injuries, we establish a clear connection between the two, providing a comprehensive view of the situation.

image services cards

Treatment Appropriateness

Our MPR services extend to evaluating the suitability of medical treatments. We assess whether the provided treatments align with the individual’s condition and needs.

image services cards

Consultation with Treating Providers

When necessary, we engage in consultations with the treating healthcare providers to gain deeper insights into the case. This collaborative approach enhances the accuracy and thoroughness of our reviews.

Optimizing Treatment and Cost Savings

One of the primary objectives of our MPR services is to optimize treatment plans. By conducting comprehensive assessments, we ensure that individuals receive the most appropriate and effective treatments for their mental health conditions. This not only benefits the individuals by improving their well-being but also results in potential cost savings for healthcare payers.

Contact Us

Flexibility in Evaluation

At SMHWI, we understand that face-to-face Independent Medical/Psychiatric Examinations may not always be feasible. Therefore, our MPR services offer a flexible alternative that maintains the highest standards of accuracy and professionalism. Our experienced team is well-equipped to conduct thorough evaluations remotely when necessary.

image services

Why Experience Matters

At Synergy Mental Health and Wellness Integrated (SMHWI), we take pride in our extensive experience in the fields of mental health and medical evaluations. Our years of dedicated service have solidified our position as a trusted and reliable partner, especially when it comes to providing comprehensive Medical Peer Review (MPR) services.

When it comes to critical evaluations involving mental health, having experienced professionals on your side is paramount. Our seasoned team of psychiatrists and medical experts brings a wealth of knowledge and insight to every MPR case we handle. This experience allows us to navigate complex issues, uncover crucial details, and provide valuable perspectives that can significantly impact the outcome of a case.

With SMHWI, you’re not just receiving MPR services – you’re accessing a wealth of expertise that has been honed through years of dedicated practice. We understand the intricacies of mental health and medical evaluations, and our commitment to delivering top-tier assessments remains unwavering. When you partner with us, you’re partnering with a team that prioritizes accuracy, integrity, and the pursuit of well-informed decisions in all medical and legal contexts.

Contact Us


Workers’ compensation is a vital form of insurance that serves to protect the well-being of employees injured while performing their duties. This insurance extends essential support, including medical treatment, vocational rehabilitation, and wage replacement, to those who find themselves in need.

image services

The Legal Framework

Under workers’ compensation law, employers are obliged to provide their employees with workers’ compensation insurance. This insurance ensures that when an employee suffers an injury on the job, they receive the necessary benefits without having to engage in protracted legal battles to determine fault. In exchange for these benefits, the employee typically relinquishes the right to pursue pain and suffering awards against their employer.

Contact Us

Comprehensive Benefits

Workers’ compensation benefits encompass a range of crucial elements. They cover the costs of medical bills related to on-the-job injuries, compensate for lost wages attributable to workplace injuries, and provide financial support for permanent impairments resulting from industrial injuries.

image services

The Role of Forensic Psychiatrists

In the realm of workers’ compensation, forensic psychiatrists in Arizona play a pivotal role. They may be called upon to perform either an Independent Psychiatric Evaluation (IPE) or to provide treatment to a patient through the Workers’ Compensation program.

During an Independent Psychiatric Evaluation, the psychiatrist is tasked with addressing several critical questions regarding the claimant’s condition:

1. Is there evidence of a psychiatric problem?
2. Is the industrial injury a direct cause of the psychiatric problem?
3. Is the psychiatric problem impairing the claimant’s functioning, resulting in restrictions and limitations?
4. Has the psychiatric problem reached a stationary state, and has the claimant achieved Maximum Medical Improvement?
5. What is the impairment rating according to the AMA criteria?
6. Does the claimant require ongoing mental health care or supportive mental health care?
7. What constitutes the standard of care and best practices for addressing the psychiatric problem?

These evaluations are meticulous, typically lasting two to three hours and often involving psychological tests such as the MMPI. These assessments serve to validate subjective presentations and confirm diagnoses, contributing invaluable insights into the claimant’s condition.

Contact Us


Within the realm of workers’ compensation, scenarios may arise where a mental health expert witness is tasked with delivering care to a patient who is already within the Workers’ Compensation program. In these situations, a Worker’s Compensation Claim Adjuster takes on the responsibility of approving mental health treatment, typically guided by the results of an Independent Medical Evaluation (IME) or as directed by an Industrial Judge.

Compensation for the services provided by the psychiatry expert witness adheres to the approved Arizona Workers’ Compensation fee schedule, with payment handled by the respective Insurance Carrier. For more detailed information regarding the Workers’ Compensation program, you can refer to the official website of the Industrial Commission of Arizona (

At SMHWI, we offer comprehensive psychiatric treatment and medication management integrated with psychotherapy for individuals covered under Workers’ Compensation. It’s important to note that the ease of collaboration can vary among different Workers’ Compensation Insurance Carriers. Our selection of carriers and adjusters is typically based on their degree of flexibility, responsiveness, and their ability to process reimbursement in a timely manner. We are committed to ensuring that individuals under the Workers’ Compensation program receive the specialized care they need to facilitate their recovery and well-being.


image services


In the realm of psychiatric impairment and disability in Arizona, multifaceted questions often surface, stemming from various circumstances, including personal injury, workers’ compensation claims, short-term (STD) and long-term disability (LTD), social security disability (SSDI) cases, workplace accommodation needs, and the role of psychiatric diseases in the evaluation process.

Mental health is a crucial facet of our overall well-being, with approximately 20% of Americans experiencing a mental disorder at some point in their lives. Among them, those with mental personality disorders or other psychiatric conditions often require specialized assessment. Of those individuals, an estimated 30% who report a mental disability, as assessed by a competent psychotherapist or pediatric psychiatrist, continue to be employed. However, there are instances when psychiatric symptoms exacerbate, leading to impairments in one’s ability to function effectively in a work environment. It’s not uncommon for a substance abuse counselor or a therapist for anxiety to contribute to these interdisciplinary evaluations, especially when mental health disorders are a significant component of the case.

Research indicates that mental illness ranks as the second most frequently reported cause of activity limitations, second only to musculoskeletal conditions. Moreover, neuropsychiatric disorders are progressively responsible for nearly 30% of disabilities on a global scale, a concerning trend that places these conditions squarely within the purview of Synergy Mental Health and Wellness Integrated and mental health services in the US and Arizona.

Requests for psychiatric impairment/disability evaluations can be initiated by employers, employees, or third parties, such as disability case management companies or attorneys, depending on the unique circumstances surrounding each case. These assessments are crucial in determining the appropriate support and accommodations necessary for those diagnosed with psychiatric diseases, including when they are part of a comprehensive treatment plan from a mental institution, this includes the state of Arizona.

The concept of disability is complex, intricately defined by specific laws and insurance policies, contingent upon the context in which it arises. Psychiatric disability, a subset of this concept, pertains to a state of activity limitation or participation restrictions primarily associated with mental health conditions. The American Disabilities Act (ADA) defines disability as the “physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity.” Varying definitions, however, exist across different entities, reflecting the broad spectrum of conditions that mental health professionals, such as psychiatric evaluators within a Synergy Mental Health and Wellness Integrated in Arizona, must consider.

Psychiatric impairment characterizes a weakened state resulting from a psychiatric disorder. According to the ADA, Mental Impairment encompasses various mental or psychological disorders, including mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illnesses, and specific learning disabilities. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines impairment as “a problem in body function or structure, such as a significant deviation or loss.”

To summarize, impairment represents a symptom of an underlying issue, while disability pertains to the extent to which this symptom hinders an individual’s ability to carry out various activities. These terms, although sometimes used interchangeably, hold distinct connotations. A medical evaluator, often a seasoned psychiatrist or psychotherapist, is responsible for determining impairment, while the decision on disability status is typically an administrative or legal matter adjudicated by a court, government agency, or insurance company panel.

A plethora of psychiatric symptoms, which can be evaluated and treated by mental health professionals at mental institutions almost anywhere in the US, and in our centers in Arizona or health services, can contribute to impairments in individuals. Consequently, these impairments may manifest as an inability to adhere to tasks, unreliability, difficulty in working alongside colleagues or customers, struggles with job-related stress, or challenges in resolving conflicts.

Due to these impairments, individuals may necessitate specific restrictions on how they perform tasks or engage in particular activities. For instance, an employee with a diagnosed mental health disorder may require accommodations recommended by a mental health therapist or a psychiatrist if is the case.

In light of these restrictions and limitations, evaluators may also be tasked with recommending accommodations. These accommodations, often guided by the expertise of mental health professionals, are integral to facilitating an individual’s successful integration into their work environment and fostering their well-being.

Contact Us

Questions frequently posed during Psychiatric Impairment Evaluations include

• Providing a comprehensive description of all clinically supported psychiatric diagnoses.

• Engaging in a discussion regarding the current standard of care and best practices for the diagnosed condition, encompassing treatment modalities, treatment frequency, expected duration, and anticipated outcomes.

• Determining if the individual’s impairments, attributable to their mental illness, inhibit them from conducting their usual life activities, including those related to employment. This discussion should also delve into any cognitive and social impairments that are substantiated.

• Defining the restrictions and limitations that can be reasonably supported, along with their proposed time frames.

• Assessing whether the insured individual is constrained or restricted from carrying out activities specific to their occupation in different environments, such as under different employers, supervisors, or locations.

• Identifying any non-medical barriers contributing to the claimant’s impaired functioning.

• In essence, the intricate landscape of psychiatric impairment and disability evaluations necessitates a meticulous and comprehensive approach, with the aim of providing individuals with the necessary support to overcome the challenges they face.

image services


The terrain of fitness-for-duty evaluations delves into the realm of employer concerns regarding an employee’s capability to perform their job effectively. Such evaluations are typically requested to ascertain if an employee, owing to a medical or psychiatric condition, is capable of fulfilling essential job functions. Similarly, these evaluations may also be sought to gauge an employee’s readiness to return to work after a period of absence. For instance, employers may trigger a fitness-for-duty evaluation in response to disruptive behavior exhibited by an employee in the workplace, concerns regarding the potential for violent behavior, or doubts about the individual’s ability to operate equipment safely.

It’s important to emphasize that the mere presence of a psychiatric illness or diagnosis does not automatically render an individual unfit for duty or psychiatrically impaired. The impact of a psychiatric disorder on workplace performance varies considerably based on the severity of symptoms.

In contrast to physical impairments, psychiatric disorders do not neatly delineate an individual’s ability to perform specific job functions. For instance, a person with a broken arm is unequivocally impaired from safely driving a school bus. In contrast, someone with a generalized anxiety disorder may or may not experience impairment in carrying out the same job.

The fundamental factors contributing to an individual’s fitness for duty encompass their capacity to focus on tasks, maintain productivity, demonstrate reliability, and exhibit motivation. Additionally, effective interpersonal functioning is crucial, including the ability to engage with supervisors, coworkers, and customers harmoniously.

Certain professions, such as law enforcement, directly impact public safety, necessitating stringent evaluations. However, roles that don’t require handling firearms may still demand the ability to manage stress effectively, focus on tasks, maintain productivity, and interact positively with customers and colleagues.

Human Resource Department managers often rely on medical records from an employee’s therapist or psychiatrist. However, it’s important to acknowledge that treating providers are inherently biased toward the best interests of their patients, with their focus primarily centered on clinical symptoms rather than functional capabilities. They base their opinions largely on the subjective reports of their patients and may not have the time or inclination to review collateral information that could be pertinent for a comprehensive functional analysis but less critical for clinical treatment. Moreover, considerations related to secondary gain, symptom minimization, symptom exaggeration, or treatment avoidance may come into play. In many cases, treating clinicians find it challenging to transition from a therapeutic to a forensic role in these evaluations.

As an independent psychiatrist, I undertake a thorough review of the employee’s social history, encompassing past and current educational and work experiences, prior successes, and instances of failure, disability claims, work-related disciplinary actions, as well as current job descriptions and the rationale behind the request for a fitness-for-duty assessment. My evaluation extends to a comprehensive examination of past and current mental health and medical records. In addition to a comprehensive psychiatric assessment that encompasses a review of psychiatric symptoms, mental status, and cognitive functioning, I incorporate the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) to objectify findings and gauge the validity of the clinical interview.

Contact Us

Typical questions addressed during a Fitness-for-Duty evaluation include

• Does the employee have a psychiatric condition?

• Are there restrictions or limitations stemming from the psychiatric condition that might impede their ability to perform essential job functions?

• Which specific tasks may the employee struggle to complete?

• Are there accommodations the employer could consider implementing to facilitate the employee’s performance of essential job functions?

• Does the employee pose a significant risk of harm to themselves or others?

• Does the current treatment align with the standard of care? Are there alternative treatments the employee should explore?

• Is the employee in need of time off work? What is the rationale for this time off? Should the time off be continuous or intermittent? What is the expected duration of the leave?

image services

I-601 Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility

Navigating the intricate landscape of the I-601 Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility requires careful consideration and, where necessary, legal counsel. Below, I provide insights based on discussions with immigration attorneys, my experience, lectures, articles, and evaluations I’ve conducted. It’s essential to note that the following should not be construed as medical or legal advice.

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1996 includes provisions for the I-601 Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility. These provisions allow for the argument of “Extreme Hardship” that may befall a United States citizen or lawful resident who is a “qualifying relative” of an individual (referred to as the “Alien”) facing potential denial of admission to the United States.

A “qualifying relative” typically includes the Alien’s spouse, parent, child, or fiancée, provided they are a U.S. citizen or lawful resident.

“Extreme hardship” denotes hardships that exceed the typical challenges a qualifying relative might encounter if the Alien is denied entry into the United States. While this is a high standard, it is not as elevated as other standards in immigration law, such as “extraordinary and extremely unusual.” The final determination of whether extreme hardship exists rests with an immigration judge or adjudicator. Thus, presenting a persuasive and compelling argument substantiating extreme hardship is of paramount importance.

An independent psychiatric assessment may be essential for a comprehensive evaluation of the mental and medical facets contributing to extreme hardship.

Crucial considerations encompass the psychiatric and medical conditions of the qualifying relative and the interpersonal relationships that could prevent them from relocating out of the country with the Alien in the event of denied admission.

For instance, a compelling case can be made if the qualifying relative faces significant medical challenges, necessitating ongoing treatment from established providers and a physical and emotional dependence on the Alien for continued care. Therefore, an in-depth exploration of psychiatric and medical issues assumes significance.

Another compelling scenario arises when the qualifying relative has elderly parents dependent on the Alien for financial, emotional, or physical support. Similarly, if the qualifying relative has minor children from a previous relationship, shares legal custody, and cannot remove the children from the United States, a case for extreme hardship is strengthened. Examining the family tree is pivotal in understanding the bonds that bind families together and the potential ramifications of inadmissibility on familial connections.

Psychosocial aspects play a central role in any psychiatric assessment. Consequently, it’s essential to consider the qualifying relative’s occupation, financial situation, and the potential risks they might face if they were to relocate out of the United States to the Alien’s home country. For example, if the Alien’s country is embroiled in conflict, extreme hardship could be a genuine concern. Additionally, if the qualifying relative holds a well-paying job that supports other family members and relocating them to the Alien’s country would jeopardize their financial stability, this is a significant factor contributing to extreme hardship.

Once the evaluation is complete and collateral documents have been reviewed, a comprehensive report is generated outlining the potential extreme hardships that could befall the qualifying relatives. This report is then submitted to the attorney, who incorporates it into the requisite letters, forms, and supporting documentation submitted to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

For further information, you can refer to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services definition of Extreme Hardship and a list of items to consider through this link.

Contact Us


Testamentary capacity, in the legal context, pertains to one’s ability to execute a valid will. It hinges on two fundamental components: the capacity to comprehend pertinent facts and an awareness of the consequences, whether taking or abstaining from specific actions.

Crucially, testamentary capacity is not an overarching, static trait but a context-specific one. An individual might possess general testamentary capacity but be under the sway of a delusion that would invalidate the will. Conversely, someone grappling with a mental illness may still possess the requisite capability to execute their will, as established in the case of Banks v. Goodfellow.

Special attention is directed toward conditions that could affect cognition, judgment, impulsivity, or reality testing. Additionally, the potential influence of undue pressure or manipulation on the testator must be evaluated.

The typical presumption is that individuals maintain autonomy and personal freedom concerning the allocation of their assets. Any attempt to challenge this presumption necessitates gathering sufficient evidence to counter it.

In accordance with the Banks v. Goodfellow Test, key questions include:

• What is the nature and impact of creating a will?

• What is the extent of the estate in question?

• Who stands to benefit from the testator’s will, both those included and excluded?

• Does or did the testator grapple with mental illness or dementia?

• Have there been previous wills, and if so, how do they differ and why?

• What factors underpin the inclusion or exclusion of potential beneficiaries?

• Is there a need for a second opinion?

image services


The Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS 14-5101) define an “incapacitated person” as an individual whose decision-making capacity concerning their person is impaired due to various factors, such as mental illness, mental deficiency, mental disorder, physical illness or disability, chronic substance use, chronic intoxication, or other causes, with the exception of minority. In essence, this individual lacks the capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions regarding their own welfare.

In such cases, where an individual is unwell and unable to manage their daily affairs, the need for a guardian may arise. Any concerned party interested in the well-being of the incapacitated person may petition for the appointment of a guardian. Once the petition is lodged, a court hearing is convened to determine the veracity of the claim of incapacity. During this process, the court ensures that the alleged incapacitated person is provided with legal representation and conducts interviews with a court-appointed investigator and examinations by a qualified medical professional, psychologist, or registered nurse.

Moreover, ARS 14-5303 delineates court procedures and the specific components that should be incorporated into the report submitted to the court by the evaluating physician. These components include:

• A detailed description of the physical, psychiatric, or psychological diagnosis of the individual.

• A comprehensive assessment outlining any functional impairments exhibited by the alleged incapacitated person, along with an explanation of how these impairments hinder their capacity to receive or evaluate information when making decisions or communicating informed choices.

• An analysis of the daily living tasks that the alleged incapacitated person can perform autonomously or with minimal guidance.

• A comprehensive list of medications being administered to the individual, including dosages and descriptions of the effects of each medication, to the best of the declarant’s knowledge.

• A prognosis regarding potential improvement in the individual’s condition and recommendations for the most suitable rehabilitation or care plan.

• Any additional information that the physician, psychologist, or registered nurse deems relevant.

Guardianship can be assumed by any qualified individual. However, ARS 14-5311 establishes a prioritized order of consideration for potential guardians:

• A guardian previously appointed by another jurisdiction.

• An individual or corporation nominated by the incapacitated person, provided the individual possesses sufficient mental capacity to make an informed choice.

• The person nominated in a durable power of attorney or health care power of attorney.

• The spouse of the incapacitated person.

• An adult child of the incapacitated person.

• A parent of the incapacitated person, including someone nominated through a will or other signed document by a deceased parent.

• Any relative with whom the incapacitated person resided for more than six months prior to the petition.

• The nominee of a person responsible for the incapacitated person’s care.

• In cases where the incapacitated person is a veteran, the Department of Veteran’s Services.

• A licensed public fiduciary.

Furthermore, ARS 14-5312 outlines the powers and responsibilities vested in a court-appointed guardian. Essentially, a guardian of an incapacitated person, or ward, assumes powers akin to those of a parent over an unemancipated minor child, with certain exceptions. Notably, a guardian is not held liable to third parties for acts solely carried out by the ward due to the guardianship. Consequently, the guardian is tasked with decisions related to the ward’s housing, sustenance, clothing, healthcare, and education. In instances where a conservator has not been appointed, the guardian may also manage the ward’s financial resources for their support, care, and education. Should a conservator be appointed by the court, they take on the responsibility of managing the ward’s estate.

Contact Us


In accordance with Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S. § 13-4501), an individual deemed incompetent to stand trial is defined as a defendant who, due to a mental illness, defect, or disability, lacks the capacity to comprehend the nature and purpose of the legal proceedings against them or to participate effectively in their own defense. In cases involving individuals under eighteen years of age, incompetence to stand trial also encompasses those who lack the current ability to engage in rational discussions with their legal counsel or possess a rational and factual understanding of the charges brought against them. Notably, the mere presence of a mental illness, defect, or disability alone does not automatically render a defendant incompetent to stand trial.

The issue of competency may be raised by the defense attorney, the prosecuting attorney, or the court itself. In instances where the court requires further evaluation, a forensic mental health expert may be enlisted to ascertain the existence of reasonable grounds necessitating an examination of the defendant. Competency hearings fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the superior court, and it is within the court’s purview to appoint two or more mental health experts to conduct examinations, provide reports, and potentially testify. Additionally, any party involved may retain their own expert to conduct examinations at their expense.

Competency evaluations can be conducted while the defendant is in custody or out of custody. Importantly, the defendant possesses the right to collaborate with their defense attorney in formulating their approach to the evaluation; however, the attorney does not have the right to be present during the competency evaluation.

A psychiatric competency to stand trial evaluation entails a comprehensive clinical forensic psychiatric assessment, encompassing elements such as past medical and psychiatric history, current medical and psychiatric issues, social and developmental background, a mental status examination, and screening for malingering. It also involves evaluating the defendant’s thought processes, capacity to understand, cooperate, and communicate. Furthermore, the assessment encompasses an examination of the defendant’s awareness and comprehension of courtroom procedures, legal rights, potential pleas, charges, and potential consequences.

A.R.S. § 13-4509 mandates that a Competency to Stand Trial Report must contain, at a minimum, the following information:

• Identification of each mental health expert who examined the defendant.

• A description of the nature, content, extent, and outcomes of the examination, including any conducted tests.

• The factual basis for the findings.

• An expert opinion regarding the defendant’s competency.

If the mental health expert determines the defendant is incompetent to stand trial, the report must also include:

• An explanation of how the mental illness, defect, or disability contributes to the incompetence.

• Prognosis for the defendant.

• Recommendations regarding the most appropriate treatment in the state, considering the defendant’s therapeutic needs and potential impact on public safety.

• An assessment of whether the defendant is incompetent to refuse treatment, warranting involuntary treatment.

• If the examiner finds the defendant currently competent due to ongoing psychotropic medication, the report should address the necessity of continued treatment and describe any potential limitations of the medication on competency.

If the defendant is deemed competent to stand trial, the case is subsequently transferred back to the original court for trial proceedings.

In the event that the defendant is found incompetent to stand trial, the outcome is contingent upon the severity of the crime and the likelihood of the defendant’s restoration. For misdemeanor charges, the court may hold a hearing to dismiss the charge if the defendant is deemed incompetent.

For felony charges, if there is substantial probability of the defendant being restored to competency within 21 months (A.R.S. § 13-4511), the court determines the maximum sentence applicable to the defendant. Based on the nature of the crime and the maximum sentence, the court may order restoration, which could be in-custody or out-of-custody, inpatient or outpatient, with or without medication, and specify the duration of the restoration.

If there is no substantial probability of restoration to competency within 21 months (A.R.S. § 13-4517), the court may opt to dismiss the charges without prejudice, initiate civil commitment proceedings, or appoint a guardian.

image services


In accordance with Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S. § 13-502), an individual may be found guilty except for insane if, at the time of committing a criminal act, they were afflicted with a mental disease or defect of such severity that they were incapable of recognizing the wrongfulness of the criminal act. This legal standard is aligned with the principles of M’Naghten’s rule for assessing criminal responsibility.

Importantly, the statute expressly excludes voluntary intoxication or withdrawal from alcohol or drugs, character defects, psychosexual disorders, or impulse control disorders as grounds for asserting legal insanity. Conditions that do not meet the criteria for legal insanity encompass momentary, temporary states resulting from situational pressures, as well as moral decay, depravity, or emotional responses stemming from anger, jealousy, revenge, hatred, or other motives in individuals not afflicted by a mental disease, defect, or abnormality manifested solely through criminal conduct.

The burden of proof falls upon the defendant, who must establish their legal insanity through clear and convincing evidence.

A comprehensive psychiatric criminal responsibility evaluation involves a thorough clinical psychiatric assessment. This evaluation encompasses elements such as a review of the individual’s past medical and psychiatric history, existing medical and psychiatric conditions, social and developmental background, and an exhaustive examination of the events leading up to, during, and following the alleged criminal act. Of particular focus is the mental state of the defendant at the time of the offense and the connection between the mental disease and the alleged offense.

Pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3994, if a defendant is found guilty except for insane, the court will order the defendant’s commitment to a mental health facility, most likely the Arizona State Hospital, under the jurisdiction of the Department of Health Services. If the criminal act did not result in or pose a threat of serious injury, the individual will be subject to civil commitment. They will remain in treatment until they can demonstrate, through clear and convincing evidence, that they no longer suffer from a mental disease and do not pose a danger to others. However, before release, the court will consider the individual’s complete criminal history and their potential for re-offending.

In cases where the criminal act caused or threatened death or serious injury, the court will place the individual under the supervision of the Psychiatric Security Review Board for a duration equivalent to the sentence they could have received had they been found guilty. Upon completion of this period, the individual may be eligible for release if they can establish, through clear and convincing evidence, that they no longer suffer from a mental disease and are not a danger to society. The Board holds the authority to vote on conditional release with continued monitoring and supervision. Should the individual become non-compliant, the Board’s order empowers law enforcement agencies to take them into custody and return them to a secure state mental health facility.

Contact Us


Our fee schedule for forensic services is structured as follows:

Evaluations: The cost for evaluations is $350 per hour. This covers various aspects, including meetings, communications, document review, consultation, in-person and telephone interviews, and the preparation of reports. An estimated guideline is typically around 50 pages of document review per hour, with a one-inch stack of documents roughly equating to 250 pages.

MMPI Testing (if appropriate): The MMPI test, when deemed necessary, requires approximately two to four hours for consent, administration, scoring, and review.

Cancellation/No Show: In cases where records are reviewed, but the evaluation is subsequently canceled or there is a no-show, payment will be required for the time spent reviewing the records. If an evaluation or meeting is scheduled but canceled with less than 48 business hours’ notice, a $350 cancellation fee will be billed. If the appointment is not canceled and the client does not attend, payment will be required for the time reserved for the interview, which typically amounts to 2 hours, or $700 (in addition to the time spent reviewing collateral records).

Independent Psychiatric Evaluation (IPE): A standard IPE typically consumes 7 to 10 hours of professional time. To secure an IPE appointment, a $2,100 retainer is required at least 48 hours before the scheduled session.

Testimony/Deposition: For testimony or deposition services, our fee is set at $450 per hour (portal to portal). Time is scheduled in blocks of 2 hours. If an evaluation or meeting is scheduled but canceled with less than 48 hours’ notice, a $450 cancellation fee will be applied. If the appointment or meeting is not canceled, the full fee will be retained. Additional time, if required, will be billed in one-hour increments. To confirm a provider’s appearance for deposition or testimony, a $900 retainer is required in advance.

Please note that our fee schedule is designed to ensure transparency and fairness in billing for the various forensic services we provide.

image services

If you or a loved one are experiencing a crisis or life-threatening emergency, please dial 911

· Central Arizona Crisis Line: (602) 222-9444 or (800) 631-1314
· National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: (800) 275-8255 (TALK)
· Teen Lifeline ( (602) 248-8336 (TEEN)

image Background section